-

 

CST 338 – Software Design –Wk04 Learning Journal: Markov Code Review

Who did you work with?

I worked with Kelia Smith.

What was your strategy for solving the Markov assignment?

My strategy to solve Markov was to thoroughly read the prompt first. After reading, I began by entering the fields. I then added the stubs for the methods so I can get a good idea of what I needed to do. Then I finally got down to coding while keeping the prompt open for clarification. After implementing all methods I ran the test file and revised any areas where the tests failed. I was not able to complete Markov as intended.

What was THEIR strategy for solving the Markov assignment?

Lia’s strategy is also to read the prompt thoroughly. She then creates a list of tasks she needs to do for the project. For Markov, she added the fields and method stubs. She then followed along with the prompt to implement each method one by one. She then ran the test file to check for errors indicated by the tests that were failing. She continued revising her code until everything became functional.

How would you change your strategy having worked on the assignment?

I believe that going forward I would like to keep my current strategy and add Lia’s strategy of making a to-do list of tasks for the project. This will allow me to keep track of what is pending as well as catch anything I have missed. I would also need to adjust how early I start to code. If I start as early as possible, I can get help from our TA or our professor if I get stuck on a particular problem.

According to your classmate(s): how well does your code follow the Google Java Style?

According to my classmate, after going through my code, she could not explicitly see any areas of the style guide I may not have followed. I had the correct import statements, naming conventions of variables, whitespace usage, and have correctly utilized block comments throughout my code.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

-
Week 4 – CST – 300 Module 4 OLI – Module 4 and 5 This week’s OLI required us to meet with our team and discuss what we have learned from this unit. It was interesting to compare what I have learned to what the rest of my team learned from their experience with the unit. The assignment included an activity called “2 Truths, 1 Lie” which required each team member to share three strengths related to our group project. Of the three strengths, two were supposed to be truths and one a lie without disclosing which were truths and which was the lie. The rest of the team had to guess which of the three was the lie. For the most part, we were all able to pick out the lie from the strengths. That activity showed me that we are becoming familiar with our team members’ strengths which will help in assigning tasks during challenging projects. The last part of the assignment consisted of answering questions from what each of us shared. Everyone of our members agreed that it is a good idea to allo...
Read more
-
  Week 5 – CST – 300 Module 5 OLI – Module 6 and 7 The OLI for this week was interesting. It helped us recognize conflict and showed us how to deal with them using different conflict strategies. Module 6 showed us a video where Kurt and Freda had a conversation which quickly escalated into a conflict. Freda was questioning the level of a platform that had been checked already. Kurt told Freda that he didn’t trust her leveling phone app. After arguing for some time, Kurt noticed that the platform was not level because there was a piece of wood underneath it. I first noticed the conflict when Kurt told Freda that he did not trust her leveling app around the 15 second mark of the video. Module 7 was challenging, here we had to use the best conflict strategy to deal with conflict based on how important the relationship is and how much do we care about the problem. An example was in the scenario where you asked Taylor, a friend of a friend for a ride to get wood because your car...
Read more
-
Week 8 – CST – 300 Module 8 OLI – Post-Test This week we had to take the post-test which was a culmination of what we have learned throughout the course. It started off with opinion questions where you had to choose whether you agreed or disagreed with the statement. I compared my answers to the pre-test answers and, although they are not graded, I believe my answers improved. From the OLI modules, I learned that you must consider everyone’s opinions and to use conflict resolution techniques when there is difference of opinions. When someone is expressing their opinion, you must use active listening and let them know you understood by repeating to them what they told you in your own words. For dealing with conflicts, you must use active listening and then formulate an assertion message to deal with the conflict.   Part 1: Review Other Team’s Final Video Projects Gigabit Goon Squad Public Video – 1.       Is the topic well covered? Yes, I bel...
Read more